Multi-fandom shipper. Have fun exploring. Header picture thing not mine.

(More information in the sobre mí page)

February 23rd
11:25 PM
Via

joshishollywood:

I mean really, the CGI bird flew into the fountain willingly

If you have a problem with that, tell it to Darwinism

  1. andymagnuseth reblogged this from squidmama
  2. canadiannarwhal reblogged this from spookyhouse
  3. kristmas reblogged this from spookyhouse
  4. herlonelyangel reblogged this from mcfeegle and added:
    truth. i actually feel sick whenever i see those. (i may have had to unfollow five people in the course of an hour. and...
  5. myomy said: ppl are having a certain DEBATE over weather that bird + chocolate was “ethical” or not (i.e. animal cruelty)
  6. mcfeegle reblogged this from herlonelyangel and added:
    If it’s just a CGI bird than that’s not so bad. But I do not accept Darwinism as an excuse for anything. Ever. Sorry to...
  7. st-andrei reblogged this from alostcompass
  8. princeoftypos reblogged this from davestripper
  9. dearpacificdaii reblogged this from badcgijosh
  10. alostcompass reblogged this from britanniarulethewaves
  11. britanniarulethewaves reblogged this from badcgijosh
  12. inappropriatelyhittingorphans said: I’m more surprised that people have a problem with the situation in the first place. As if they don’t even have the brain power to understand that the movie would get fucked from every direction if they actually did this to a bird.
  13. proudlubber reblogged this from badcgijosh
  14. melodiousjustice reblogged this from badcgijosh
  15. opossumtoes said: NO. THEY *MADE* THAT CGI BIRD FLY INTO THAT FOUNTAIN. HE DIDN’T HAVE A *CHOICE*. THEY TOOK AWAY HIS *RIGHTS*. I DON’T GET WHY YOU DON’T SEE HOW THIS IS A *SENSITIVE* ISSUE - COMPARABLE TO GAY-BASHING.